Tuesday, June 19, 2012

Final Exam-Article Reviews

1. To find this article, I just opened up the Clark library page, went to the Online Resources tab, and then opened up articles and databases. I went to Ebsco Host and typed in the author’s name. His article popped up right on top.


2. This one was a bit more complicated to find because there was so many results. I found the domain name after pasting the authors name on Google and scrolling down to what I figured was it. Then it took me to the Guardian webpage and I scrolled down to find this article.

3. The first article by Merrill Distad looks very credible. The “A” is already shown for the author, “S”, this author looks like he uses many in text sources and it looks like it this article is part of a book, so the bibliography should be at the end. “P”, the purpose of this article seems very straight forward. He is informing the audience about how print books are important. “E”, it looks like he talks an even amount about both sides of the story and “C” and “T” is accurate as well, he covers one topic and it was published recently.
The second article by Ewan Morrison seems a bit sketchy. I do not know what the Guardian is or much about it. It seems like a magazine or news page. I do see there is an author, but no sources because it seems like an interview. I do see the purpose he is trying to get, but the “E” and “C” are poor. The article rambles on about so many different topics and does not really get a good argument going. “T” seems accurate, it was published in 2011.

4. Ewan Morrison writes his article, “Are books dead, and can authors survive?” in an interesting manner. His main points in this argument are to get through to people that books and other history may be coming to an end, or evolve into newer, greater things. He says e-books are the new books, and technology has advanced so much that many of these once paid for objects, are now free. Morrison talks about the decreasing salary of not only authors, but many companies and individuals because of piracy, availability, and the Long Tail, which he calls companies like Amazon, I-Tunes, Netflix, and EBay (Morrison). The idea that all these creations of history may someday disappear makes Morrison wonder about how people will make a living.
   Morrison gave quotes from people in different industries about how this change in technology has cost decrease in production, salaries, and profit. He states that over 69% of people are committing piracy, which means that percentage of companies or industries are losing profit (Morrison). Morrison also makes the point that the biggest profited companies like Google, Amazon, and Apple, are providing free content, while advertisers are buying free space to sell stuff to us. Therefore, these big non-profit companies that do not sell anything, will provide entertainment for us, last a long time, and advertisers will sell through them. Books will become intertwined with this free entertainment, and may even evolve into a new era technology of books.  
~Kendra~

Friday, June 15, 2012

Unit 10-Creating A Webpage


Summary: WOW, just have to say I can almost completely understand how pages are created and uploaded to the internet. I now know the meaning of most of the encoding on the html page, like where you can insert text, how to change the color, font, and style. This assignment was simple and followed through very nicely. I really had a fun time putting together my own web page! This assignment covers a lot about documents from a computer, from the internet, and how to encode them both to make sense.  I feel this is much different from a blog because in a blog, you are putting text right on the internet, and not creating a document on your hard drive and uploading it to the internet. It is also much more in depth. You don’t just push a button to get blue text or Times font.

~Kendra~

Sunday, June 10, 2012

Unit 9 Finding Information


1.) Search Engine: Google.com
Search Strategy: privacy AND (law* or legal) AND identity
Citation: "Attorney, Law Firm Directory." Find Lawyers and Law Information  HG.org. N.p., n.d. Web. 10 June 2012. <http://www.hg.org/>.
Credible? This site was a .ORG site, so from knowledge, I knew that anyone could have created this website. It did seem to give very relevant information; the year was up to date, there was an about us section which identifies the company background info, and the site also included associations and publications. I really liked this site because it has current events, upcoming events and other news about the law. I believe this website has the S.P.E.C.T. of the criteria for credibility.

2.) Search Engine: Google.com
Search Strategy: privacy AND (law* or legal) AND identity
Citation: "Privacy and Security | BCP Business Center." Privacy and Security | BCP Business Center. N.p., n.d. Web. 10 June 2012. <http://business.ftc.gov/privacy-and-security>
Credible? I found this website as a .GOV and it seemed credible because it had links to other sources that you could also contact and read about. It was a government bureau sponsored website and included info about why they made this site, as well as about them. I would say it covers the A.S.P.E.C. of the criteria because it does not specify when this information was written, however since it is the government bureau, I would imagine that it is up to date.

3.) Search Engine: Google.com
Search Strategy: privacy AND law .edu
Citation: Gilbertson, Seth F., and Joseph C. Storch. "Office of General Counsel."Http://counsel.cua.edu/FERPA/publications/. N.p., 16 Dec. 2009. Web. 10 June 2012. <http://counsel.cua.edu/FERPA/publications/NACUANoteCloudContract.cfm>.
Credible? This site was a .EDU and was also the hardest to find. I found lots of sites to school websites as links but they did not cover the information needed. I finally found one that is close to what I wanted. It gives the A.S.P.E.C.T. of the criteria. There is lots of sources and coverage on the subject.

4.) Search Engine: Google.com
Search Strategy: privacy AND law
Citation: "Privacy Laws and Business." Privacy Laws and Business. N.p., n.d. Web. 10 June 2012. <http://www.privacylaws.com/>.
Credible? This search for .COM was definitely the easiest one. It beats the other by 8:1 per search page. Finding a credible one is the trickiest part though. I finally found one that included most of the aspect criteria. I did not find the authors but the publishers wrote about the business and why. I also found links to other sites and publishers.

Summary: I found this search to be very interesting and informative with information that can be helpful in later searches. I found that the .GOV worked the best and showed up second most but was also the most relevant on information of the aspect criteria on each site. The other search domains were a little difficult to get accurate results because it was a search on privacy and law, and usually that pertains to the government. I did learn how to evaluate a site more and completely understand what a website needs to be credible. And it is also just common sense. :)

~Kendra~